The Pagan Path

Those who wonder are not lost; they are trying to awaken! 'The Sleeper must awaken!'

Wednesday, June 02, 2010

Studies in the Book of the Revelation of Jesus the Christ the Son of God ( the visions ( final judgment ( the Lamb and the people of God ) pt 11

Understanding the Book of Revelation.

Then I looked, and behold, a[a] Lamb standing on Mount Zion, and with Him one hundred and forty-four thousand, having[b] His Father’s name written on their foreheads.

The tendency to look at the passage above in a physically literal way, as with many such passages, has been practiced by many churches, interpreting the phrase 'one hundred and forty-four thousand' as an exact number of persons ( of varying sorts, depending on the church, but, as I wrote several studies ago, in my study of Revelation 7, 'As I understand it; there are many out there who believe that this number (144,000 ) is a physically accurate, literal number of the children of Israel, or physical Jews, who will be saved before the end, but I believe that as several other instances in Scripture ( Psalm 50:10, Psalm 105:8 ( Deuteronomy 7:9 ), Jude 14 ( Deuteronomy 33:2, etc. ) seem to point out, this word is not always indicative of a certain quantity, but of, as with the numeral seven, a completeness, a perfection, a wholeness, even infinity': later in the same study; I pointed out that 'Those that I mentioned above as believing in a physically accurate, strictly literal interpretation of Such passages as Revelation 7:4-8, for instance, would most likely argue that this 'great multitude' refers to a different group of people than the prior passage, about the '144,000', but I would like to remind my readers of God's promise to Abram, in Genesis 17:4-6, 'As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, and you shall be a father of many nations. No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham; for I have made you a father of many nations. I will make you exceedingly fruitful; and I will make nations of you, and kings shall come from you.' Whatever the case may be; I believe that the main thing to notice here, besides the fact that John made it clear that these people were 'standing' with the Lamb, is that they, like those significant Israelites, 'twelve thousand ' from each of the tribes of Israel ( excepting one ), they all bore a special 'mark', or seal. From my previous study, of Revelation 13, we saw how that the second 'beast', from the 'earth', or land, 'causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads'. I noted how that the enemies of God's people were wont to mimic the miracles and attributes of God, whether for the purpose of trying to lessen potency of God's power, or whatever the reason may be; John makes special note here that all of these people had received 'His Father’s name written on their foreheads', thus bearing the 'mark' that signified Life, rather than 'the Mark of the Beast' that led to condemnation, as we read in chapter 13 and will see again later in this study. ( Note that these people also had a 'name written on their foreheads'. )


And I heard a voice from heaven, like the voice of many waters, and like the voice of loud thunder. And I heard the sound of harpists playing their harps.


'His brother’s name was Jubal. He was the father of all those who play the harp and flute.' ( Genesis 4:21 )

'Let our master now command your servants, who are before you, to seek out a man who is a skillful player on the harp. And it shall be that he will play it with his hand when the distressing spirit from God is upon you, and you shall be well'. ( Samuel 16:16 )

'So they came to Jerusalem, with stringed instruments and harps and trumpets, to the house of the LORD'. ( II Chronicles 20:28 )

'Praise the LORD with the harp; make melody to Him with an instrument of ten strings'. ( Psalm 33:2 )

'Sing to the LORD with the harp, with the harp and the sound of a psalm'. ( Psalm 98:5 )

'I will sing a new song to You, O God; on a harp of ten strings I will sing praises to You'. ( Psalm 144:9 )

'Praise Him with the sound of the trumpet; praise Him with the lute and harp!'

From these few examples, which, interestingly enough, come mostly from the Psalms of David, a type of Christ; we can see where John might have 'pulled' his imagery from, and where we get the traditional 'picture' of angels ( saints ) flitting about the heavenly realms in white robes, playing harps. ( One thinks of that line from an old hymn, 'a harp, a home, a crown'- When We See Christ ). Besides the fact that the harp is one of the most beautiful-sounding of musical instruments, it is probably one of the most prolific ( or was anyway ) Middle-eastern instruments used for making music; this can be witnessed to by the fact that the Scriptures record it as one of the first instruments ever played in that region of the globe, as seen above, in Genesis 4.

In previous studies; we have noted that, in the Revelation anyway, when God uttered His voice ( from 'Heaven' ); John heard 'a voice like thunder', and 'the voice of many waters'. Not wishing to re-hash too much here, but to repeat a few references; David wrote, in Psalm 29:3, 'The voice of the LORD is over the waters; the God of glory thunders; the LORD is over many waters', and speaking of the flood-waters of Noah's day, I believe, in Psalm 104:7, 'At Your rebuke they fled; at the voice of Your thunder they hastened away'. In Ezekiel 3:12, where the prophet finds himself in much the same situation as John, in Revelation 1:10, 'I heard behind me a great thunderous voice'. When this same prophet recorded his vision of 'the living creatures' in Ezekiel 1; he wrote 'When they went, I heard the noise of their wings, like the noise of many waters, like the voice of the Almighty', and later, in chapter 43 when God showed him a vision of His earthly dwelling-place, ( Ephesians 2:22 ( I Corinthians 6:19 ) , the Temple, he recorded that 'His voice was like the sound of many waters; and the earth shone with His glory'. Finally, in a wise man's discourse to his friends, in Job 37:2, the author writes, 'Hear attentively the thunder of His voice, and the rumbling that comes from His mouth'.



They sang as it were a new song before the throne, before the four living creatures, and the elders; and no one could learn that song except the hundred and forty-four thousand who were redeemed from the earth.


We are all quite familiar with the many references  that David made to 'a new song', in his Psalms ( 33:3, 40:3, 96:1, 98:1, 144:9, 149:1 ), but a fairly famous reference from Isaiah ( 42:10 ), 'Sing to the LORD a new song, and His praise from the ends of the earth, you who go down to the sea, and all that is in it, you coastlands and you inhabitants of them!', comes in the midst of one of probably one of the most well-known passages revealing Jesus the Christ, what might be called a pre-revelation. The 'voice from heaven, like the voice of many waters' that John heard, arguably the same as the 'one hundred and forty-four thousand' that John introduced earlier, now took up that 'new song' that those redeemed ones sang before, and in praise of, the One who sat on the Throne.

John wrote that 'no one could learn that song except the hundred and forty-four thousand'. In Revelation 2:17; Jesus wrote to the church of Pergamos ( of 'him that overcomes' ) that 'I will give him a white stone, and on the stone a new name written which no one knows except him who receives it',of which Isaiah had prophesied beforehand, speaking of the inhabitants of the New Jerusalem, saying, 'You shall be called by a new name, which the mouth of the LORD will name' ( Isaiah 62:2 ). This new name was given to those who believed on Jesus Christ and thus is integrally related to this new song that only a certain few could learn. This new song, obviously in praise of God in Christ, for, not only His redemptive work, but also for who He was, would have only been learn-able by those who were teachable. As with so many today, the Pharisees thought that they had all knowledge, all truth, but because they refused, for the most part, to receive the knowledge and truth that Christ brought, they were not able to learn this new song, or to sing the praises of God in Christ!


 These are the ones who were not defiled with women, for they are virgins. These are the ones who follow the Lamb wherever He goes. These were redeemed[c] from among men, being first-fruits to God and to the Lamb. And in their mouth was found no deceit,[d] for they are without fault before the throne of God.[e]


'But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, to an innumerable company of angels, to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are registered in heaven, to God the Judge of all, to the spirits of just men made perfect, to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.' ( Hebrews 12:22-24 )

In the passage above; we notice the writer to the Hebrews describing the spiritual state, or condition that the people of God have arrived at, through Christ, in the New Covenant. In doing so; he used a type of 'biblical parallelism' that we have encountered before, both in the Scriptures as a whole, and in these studies.

When John wrote that 'These are the ones who were not defiled with women, for they are virgins'; one might get the idea that John ( Jesus ) was saying that only those who had not been intimate with a woman
could hope to be one of these chosen to sing the new song before the Throne;  (in fact; I believe that some probably have, over the ages, though probably not so much anymore ) but I believe that most Christians have realized, and will readily admit that such is not the case! John, I believe, was simply saying that these had not been defiled by their contact with those 'under' the Old Covenant, 'the ministry of death' ( II Corinthians 3:7 ), but had indeed been redeemed from among men, and become 'first-fruits' ( of the Resurrection ) to God, through the earthly ministry of Christ.

'Blessed is the man to whom the LORD does not impute iniquity, and in whose spirit there is no deceit.' ( Psalm 32:2 ( II Corinthians 5:19 )

'He who works deceit shall not dwell within my house; he who tells lies shall not continue in my presence.' ( Psalm 101:7 ( John 1:47 )

'And they[a] made His grave with the wicked— but with the rich at His death, because He had done no violence, nor was any deceit in His mouth.' ( Isaiah 53:9 ( Zephaniah 3:13 )

Although I believe that no one can truly say that they have never practiced deceit, or told a lie ( however small or 'white' ); we can say, with impunity, that God did not, and does not, impute sin to our account, but transferred His Righteousness upon us thus clothing us with the righteousness of Christ! I believe too, though, that, as with all of Scripture; David's words above were 'geared' more toward a covenantal viewpoint ( see also Psalm 35:20,  Isaiah 30:10, Jeremiah 14:14, Acts 13:10, II Corinthians 4:1-6 ( Ephesians 4:14 ),Colossians 2:8 ). It goes without saying then, that we are, because of Christ's atoning work, 'without fault before the throne of God'!



Then I saw another angel flying in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach to those who dwell on the earth—to every nation, tribe, tongue, and people—saying with a loud voice, 'Fear God and give glory to Him, for the hour of His judgment has come; and worship Him who made heaven and earth, the sea and springs of water'.


 This is interesting: in John's vision now, he describes an ( singular ) angel ( 'messenger' ) bringing ( revealing ) the everlasting gospel to 'those who dwell on the earth'. Again; 'earth' here, might better be translated 'land'. I am reminded of Jesus' sending forth of the disciples to prepare His way ( 'warm'em up, so to speak ). Although the Gospel of Matthew does not record this, as does Luke's, which reads 'After these things the Lord appointed seventy others also,[a] and sent them two by two before His face into every city and place where He Himself was about to go' ( Luke 10:1-20 ), Matthew did record that Jesus 'sent out and commanded them, saying: “Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans. But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And as you go, preach, saying, ‘The kingdom of heaven is at hand' ( Matthew 10:5-23 ). In the same chapter; he later told them 'you will not have gone through the cities of Israel before the Son of Man comes. Remember that, back in the first study that we did, on the first three chapters of the Revelation, Jesus called the ministers, or 'pastors' of the seven churches 'angels', or messengers.


Jesus revealed through that 'everlasting gospel' that the time for judgment had come ( I Peter 4:17 ). Jesus said concerning the Pharisees, 'For judgment I have come into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may be made blind.' ( John 9:39 ( Malachi 3:5 ) He said earlier, in John 5:24, 'Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life', so when Jesus said this, He was obviously talking about adverse judgment, in the context of Scripture, the judgment of Old Covenant Israel ( after the flesh ).



And another angel followed, saying, “Babylon[f] is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she has made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.


'Babylon is fallen, is fallen! And all the carved images of her gods He has broken to the ground.' ( Isaiah 21:9 )


'Babylon has suddenly fallen and been destroyed. Wail for her! Take balm for her pain; perhaps she may be healed'. ( Jeremiah 51:8 )

In both of the above passages, the first of which this second 'angel' borrowed his quote from, are in reference to the fall of the Babylonian empire at the hand of the Medes and Persians ( ultimately, judgment from God-Jeremiah 50:1-3 ), I believe that it was repeated in the book of Revelation, as a sort of 'code word' for national, physical Israel ( Jerusalem and it's leaders in particular ), referring to the fact that they had done the same things to the true people of God, to the remnant, as Babylon and other surrounding nations had done. Jeremiah described, in the 25th chapter of the book of his prophecy, how God used Babylon to punish His people for their idolatry, by causing them to be led captive to a foreign land away from the Presence of God, which was signified by the Jewish Temple ( Exodus 15:17 ( II Chronicles 7:1 ). As Babylon had carried the physical nation of Israel captive; so the leaders of physical Israel had led the spiritual Israel of God captive, as witnessed by Matthew 23, Luke 4:16-21, John 8:31-36, Galatians 6:12 & 13, Ephesians 4:8, II Timothy 2:26, etc., and would now likewise be judged.  


As I explained above; most Christians understand the cry of this second 'angel' as referring to the actual city of Babylon ( on the Euphrates ) that is located in the present-day nation of Iraq, and that somehow, the re-building, and consequent destruction of this city is what John heard about, but looking at this from a covenantal perspective, or from the view-point that all or most of Scripture had to do with God's dealings with His covenant people, in particular, His Old Covenant children, the physical nation of Israel; I believe that this is not the case. Babylon, to my limited knowledge, had never covenanted with God, though they were a chosen tool of His-Jeremiah 27:6 ), and thus would not be referred to as making 'all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication', speaking, of course of the spiritual fornication ( covenant-breaking ) of which the physical 'children' of Israel ( after the flesh ) were manifestly guilty. In II Chronicles 21:11; we read, concerning king Jehoram, son of Jehoshaphat 'Moreover he made high places in the mountains of Judah, and caused the inhabitants of Jerusalem to commit harlotry, and led Judah astray'. God pled with the inhabitants of Judah in Jerusalem, in Jeremiah 13:27, reminding them that 'I have seen your adulteries and your lustful neighings, the lewdness of your harlotry, your abominations on the hills in the fields. Woe to you, O Jerusalem! Will you still not be made clean?' Recounting His love for Jerusalem ( Israel ) in the first part of Ezekiel 16; God reminds His people, in verses 16-30, how they 'played the harlot', first, with the Assyrians, and the offered themselves even as 'far as the land of the trader, Chaldea' ( see also Ezekiel 23 ). In making His case, laying charges against these people, in Hosea 4:13; God reminded them that 'My people ask counsel from their idols, and their staff informs them. For the spirit of harlotry has caused them to stray, and they have played the harlot against their God'.

Because of this spiritual ( and often, physical ) harlotry; God had determined to pour out His wrath on this apostate, covenant-breaking people, and finally make a complete end of their wickedness 'once for all' ( Daniel 12:7 ). Speaking of His chosen weapon, of Babylon, in Ezekiel 21:31, God told His 'children' 'I will pour out My indignation on you; I will blow against you with the fire of My wrath, and deliver you into the hands of brutal men who are skillful to destroy' ( see also 22:21 & 31 ). The prophet Hosea recorded that God said 'The princes of Judah are like those who remove a landmark; I will pour out My wrath on them like water' ( 5:10 ), and Zephaniah 1:18 reads that, because of this harlotry committed against God and His Covenant, 'Neither their silver nor their gold shall be able to deliver them in the day of the LORD’s wrath; but the whole land shall be devoured by the fire of His jealousy, for He will make speedy riddance of all those who dwell in the land'. Lastly; remember the words of Jesus, God's only begotten Son, in Luke 21:20-22:  'But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation is near.  Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those who are in the midst of her depart, and let not those who are in the country enter her. For these are the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled'. The 'cup of wrath' belonging to the 'children' of Israel, spoken of in the Old Covenant Scriptures, had been filled to the full, and God was now ready to judge!



Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation.



 John now witnesses a third 'angel', this one revealing the 'other side of the coin' of this 'everlasting gospel', good news to some, bad news for others; as Paul wrote to the Corinthian church, 'For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God' ( I Corinthians 1:18 ). The ones that Paul wrote of that were 'perishing' were those first-century Jews that had heard the Gospel, had walked with, and heard the Truth, yet rejected it. The apocryphal book of I Maccabees, which I believe I have mentioned before, gives us an example of those that forsook, of course, at the instigation of the Romans (or the Syrians, as the case may be ) the worship of the true God, in favor of those that were not gods, and indeed, even when Pilate, the Roman Governor, who could find no wrong ( doing ) in Jesus, asked what should be done with their King; they cried out that He should be crucified, and then drove the nails even deeper, signing their own death warrant, when they told Pilate 'We have no king but Caesar!'

Speaking of past desolations of the great city, the prophet Isaiah wrote 'Awake, awake! Stand up, O Jerusalem, you who have drunk at the hand of the LORD the cup of His fury; you have drunk the dregs of the cup of trembling, and drained it out.' ( Isaiah 51:17 ), and in Jeremiah 25:15; God pronounced judgment on the nations, telling the prophet to 'Take this wine cup of fury from My hand, and cause all the nations, to whom I send you, to drink it'. ( see also Jeremiah 51:7, Lamentations 4:21, Ezekiel 23:31-34, Habakkuk 2:16, Zechariah 12:2 )



He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name.



This, and other such passages have been, and are still used to propagate the notion that the wicked are condemned to consciously suffer enduring punishment, even after physical death. One such passage from the Hebrew Scriptures used to advance this 'doctrine' is one that we should all be fairly familiar with; Daniel 12:2, 'And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, some to shame and everlasting contempt'. Notice that Daniel, or rather Gabriel, does not contrast life and death, but rather life and contempt, or shame. Of those who did not recognize the Body of Christ ( I Corinthians 11:27-34 ); Jesus said, in Matthew 25:46, 'And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.' Again; we see a contrast between punishment and life, not death and life. One possible explanation of John's statement above, 'tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.' is that the unbelieving Jews who had not taken Jesus' warning ( Matthew 24:15-21, Luke 21:20-22. ) were thus trapped in the City ( again, see the writings of Josephus ) and engulfed in the conflagration surrounding Jerusalem and the Temple in AD70. Remember that Scripture compares the destruction of the Temple with that of Sodom and Gomorrah ( Genesis 19:24-28, Deuteronomy 29:23-28, Isaiah 1:9,  Amos 4:11, Matthew 10:15 ( Mark 6:11 ), II Peter 2:6, Jude 6 & 7 ), which cities were destroyed by physically literal 'brimstone and fire'. Some would disagree; I'm sure, but Scripture tells us ( Matthew 16:28 ( 10:23 ) that, whether Jesus came in what is often mistakenly called His 'second coming', or just in judgment; He was present at the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple!

For just a bit; lets look at John's statement 'the smoke of their torment ascends forever', and note the similarities, again, to language concerning, not only the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah ( Genesis 19:28-'the smoke of the land which went up like the smoke of a furnace' ( Genesis 15:17 ), but the Presence of God ( Exodus 19:18-'Now Mount Sinai was completely in smoke, because the LORD descended upon it in fire. Its smoke ascended like the smoke of a furnace, and the whole mountain[a] quaked greatly' ( Psalm 68:2 ), and the righteous judgment of the wicked ( Isaiah 34:10-'It shall not be quenched night or day; its smoke shall ascend forever. From generation to generation it shall lie waste; no one shall pass through it forever and ever' ).



Here is the patience of the saints; here are those[g] who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus. Then I heard a voice from heaven saying to me,[h] “Write: ‘Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from now on.’ “Yes,” says the Spirit, “that they may rest from their labors, and their works follow them.”


Remember that, back in Revelation 1:9; John comforted the churches, telling them that he too, was their 'brother and companion in the tribulation and kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ', that they were not alone, but that he too, was one of those who waited for 'the kingdom of God' ( Mark 15:43, Luke 23:51 ( Revelation 6:9 ), and for 'the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ' ( I Corinthians 1:7 ). John used the Greek ὑπομονή, transliterated hypomonē, to give the idea of 'steadfastness, constancy, endurance'. Paul exhorted the church at Colossi to 'continue in the faith, grounded and steadfast' ( Colossians 1:23 ), and speaking of the rest that they were about to enter, and which we have entered, in Christ; the writer to the Hebrews exhorted his brethren, reminding them that 'we have become partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end' ( Hebrews 3:14 ). Speaking of Abraham, and his reception of the promise ( Genesis 15, 17:1- 8 ), the Author of the letter to the Hebrews said 'And so, after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise' ( Hebrews 6:15 ). These along with the numerous examples that we read about in Hebrews 11, are those whom Jesus had in mind, I believe, when He gave these words to His servant John, although primarily He may have been referring to those first century Christians who had lost their lives ( physically ) to either Jewish or Roman persecution.


'For he who has entered His rest has himself also ceased from his works as God did from His'. ( Hebrews 4:10 )

In context, I believe, as I have reasoned elsewhere, that the entering of Christ's rest, and thus ceasing from our works, is not speaking, as some have thought, of our physical demise, and entering, as some would say 'our eternal rest', but is speaking, rather, of our becoming 'in' Christ, resting in His completed work, and ceasing from ( trusting in ) our own. Jesus words above, through John, have a more immediate sense, I believe, of giving comfort to the friends and loved ones of those who were physically dieing all around them ( I Thessalonians 4:13-18 ), but referred too, in a more expansive sense, to those who had trusted in Christ,  in the work that He had done, and was doing, and ceased to trust in their own works.





Then another angel came out of the temple which is in heaven, he also having a sharp sickle.



'Let both grow together until the harvest, and at the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, “First gather together the tares and bind them in bundles to burn them, but gather the wheat into my barn.’' ( Matthew 13:30 )

Earlier in this Gospel, before Jesus gave His disciples the parable of 'the sower', He told His disciples, speaking of this same 'harvest', 'The harvest truly is plentiful, but the laborers are few. Therefore pray the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into His harvest.' ( Matthew 9:37 & 38 ) I believe that what John saw above must have brought to ( his ) mind what God had revealed to the prophet Joel, in Joel 3:13, 'Put in the sickle, for the harvest is ripe. Come, go down; for the winepress is full, the vats overflow— for their wickedness is great', and Hosea 6:11, where God promised 'Also, O Judah, a harvest is appointed for you, when I return the captives of My people.' This 'harvest', as with any judgment, meant salvation for His people ( as in the parable of 'the wheat and the tares' above ), and everlasting destruction for His enemies ( Matthew 22:1-14 ).





And another angel came out of the temple, crying with a loud voice to Him who sat on the cloud, “Thrust in Your sickle and reap, for the time has come for You[i] to reap, for the harvest of the earth is ripe.” So He who sat on the cloud thrust in His sickle on the earth, and the earth was reaped.




'Now when He had spoken these things, while they watched, He was taken up, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. And while they looked steadfastly toward heaven as He went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel, who also said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will so come in like manner as you saw Him go into heaven.”' ( Acts 1:9-11 )

As we have seen from our study of many phrases containing the word 'cloud' in Scripture, particularly in the Prophets; 'clouds' most often indicate adverse judgment. From the passages above, which, interestingly enough, the latter one is just about the only Scriptural basis that many can find for a ( future ) physical return of Christ, we can ascertain that this One who sat 'on the cloud' was none but Jesus Christ. Interesting too, is the fact that John refers to the One on the cloud as 'another angel', in his previous statement. Now, admittedly; the translators, upon whom the prerogative has fallen, have chosen, in this case, not to capitalize 'angel' here, where in other cases 'Angel' refers specifically ( traditionally anyway ) to the Son of God ( pre-incarnate? ), and 'angel' to 'just' a messenger of God. Just a thought: I'll let my readers 'glean' from this what they will..............


In the parable of 'the wheat and tares', above, in Matthew 13:39; we read 'The enemy who sowed them is the devil, the harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are the angels'. We read earlier, in Matthew 9:26 & 37, and the parallel passage in Luke 10:2 ( 'The harvest truly is great, but the laborers are few; therefore pray the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into His harvest' ), about the upcoming harvest ( Matthew 21:33-45 ), but Jesus also said, in a related passage in John's Gospel ( 4:35 ), 'My food is to do the will of Him who sent Me, and to finish His work. Do you not say, ‘There are still four months and then comes the harvest’? Behold, I say to you, lift up your eyes and look at the fields, for they are already white for harvest!'

Concerning God's Old Covenant 'children' of Israel; Jesus spoke this parable, in Luke 13:6-9, 'A certain man7 Then he said to the keeper of his vineyard, ‘Look, for three years I have come seeking fruit on this fig tree and find none. Cut it down; why does it use up the ground?’ But he answered and said to him, ‘Sir, let it alone this year also, until I dig around it and fertilize it. And if it bears fruit, well. But if not, after that[a] you can cut it down.' ( see also Matthew 21:19 )



 Then another angel came out of the temple which is in heaven, he also having a sharp sickle.
And another angel came out from the altar, who had power over fire, and he cried with a loud cry to him who had the sharp sickle, saying, “Thrust in your sharp sickle and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth, for her grapes are fully ripe
.”



We have another example here, which we have seen much in this book, of a sort of 'biblical parallelism'. I will not endeavor here, other than certain remarks I've already made, to explain why John repeats this scenario twice, but, for whatever reason; he seems to 'see' the same vision here, just revealed in a slightly different way.

Repeating what he had 'seen' earlier, John recorded that yet 'another angel came out of the temple which is in heaven, he also having a sharp sickle'. Whether or not this was a different 'angel' seems to be  beside the point; by repeating the same event, I believe that John is again emphasizing Jesus words at the beginning of His Revelation, 'the time is near', that not only that it was a definite thing, but that the time had drawn near, it was 'at hand' ( James 5:8 )


'Binding his donkey to the vine, and his donkey’s colt to the choice vine, He washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood of grapes' ( Genesis 49:11 )

Jacob ( Israel ) prophesied the coming of Christ in judgment of His covenant people millenia before His advent. When John recorded his vision of this 'grape' harvest, one can easily tell that he must have been thinking of this prophesy in Genesis, as well as many others, like Isaiah 5:1-7, 17:6 ( 65:8 ), 24:13, Jeremiah 8:13, 25:30, and Hosea 9:10.

Although John's repetitious statement above is fairly clearly parallel to his previous one; there is one ( at least ) notable difference, this angel 'had power over fire'.

'Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life. Most assuredly, I say to you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God; and those who hear will live. For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has granted the Son to have life in Himself, and has given Him authority to execute judgment also, because He is the Son of Man.' ( John 5:24-27 )

'And Jesus said, “For judgment I have come into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may be made blind.” ' ( John 9:39 )

'“I came to send fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled!' ( Luke 12:49 )

Throughout our study, not only of the Revelation, but the whole of prophetic Scripture, it is clear that, among other things, 'fire' is often indicative of judgment ( Numbers 26:10, Deuteronomy 32:22, Psalm 46:9, Isaiah 29:6, Joel 2:30, Zephaniah 3:8, II Peter 3:7 ). In a repetition almost, as we have seen, of his previous statement; John makes abundantly clear, once again, that the 'angel' which 'came out of the temple which is in heaven' was none other than Jesus Himself, for only He has 'had power over fire', in context, the judgment, for good or evil, of His covenant people.


'So Moses said to Aaron, “Take a censer and put fire in it from the altar, put incense on it, and take it quickly to the congregation and make atonement for them; for wrath has gone out from the LORD. The plague has begun.”' ( Numbers 16:46 )

'Then one of the seraphim flew to me, having in his hand a live coal which he had taken with the tongs from the altar. And he touched my mouth with it, and said: “ Behold, this has touched your lips; your iniquity is taken away, and your sin purged.” ' ( Isaiah 6: 6 & 7 )

Although, as I pointed out above; John's extra reference above make it all the more clear that this angel was the Son of God, it is also clear that He was given power for salvation, a judgment for the better, on those who had remained true to the God of their fathers.

Interesting too, is the addition of 'the vine of the earth' and its 'grapes'. In outlining His case against His Old Covenant 'children' of Israel; God recalled, in Jeremiah 2:21, that 'I had planted you a noble vine, a seed of highest quality. How then have you turned before Me into the degenerate plant of an alien vine?' ( Jeremiah 8:13 ) Joel prophesied that God would use the enemies of His covenant people to 'thresh' them, when He said 'He has laid waste My vine, and ruined My fig tree; he has stripped it bare and thrown it away; its branches are made white' ( Joel 1:7 ) Because of their covenant unfaithfulness; God promised, in Amos 5:17, 'In all vineyards there shall be wailing, for I will pass through you,” says the LORD'. All this, and more even, should bring to the forefront of our mind, that this judgment was for or against God's covenant 'children', especially when keeping in mind passages like Isaiah 5:1-7  ( Matthew 21:33-44 ) and John 15:1-8. Lastly; God told the prophet Jeremiah,

'Therefore prophesy against them all these words, and say to them:  The LORD will roar from on high, and utter His voice from His holy habitation; He will roar mightily against His fold. He will give a shout, as those who tread the grapes, against all the inhabitants of the earth. A noise will come to the ends of the earth— for the LORD has a controversy with the nations; He will plead His case with all flesh. He will give those who are wicked to the sword,’ says the LORD.' ( Jeremiah 25: 30 & 31 )

In the love of Christ',
and in His service,
Charles Shank





 














Wednesday, May 19, 2010

The New Creation

One of the most well-known and well-used phrase in the Bible is II Corinthians 5:17, where Paul told the Corinthian church that 'if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new' ( to be honest, however, the words 'he is' are not in the original Greek, and thus the verse actually reads 'if anyone is in Christ, ( he is ) a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new' ). A  friend of mine has recently pointed out that Paul said 'if anyone is in Christ', indicating that 'if' a person is not 'in' Christ; he is not 'a new creation', 'old things' have not passed away, all things have not 'become new'. Sound about right?  I thought so too; up until a few days ago, I was fairly comfortable with the idea that we are new creation ( renewed ) because we are in Christ, having become one with Him, but as another friend has recently reminded me, we miss a lot when we try to apply the Bible directly to us, rather than allowing the context to dictate the intended meaning. Sure; I think we can say, with impunity, that we are a ( made ) 'new creation', but is that the idea that Paul meant to convey when he told the Corinthian church that those who were in Christ were a new creation. I believe that the key to understanding Paul's  first-century context is the phrase, or phrases, 'old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new'.

'In that He says, “A new covenant ”,  He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away'. ( Hebrews 8:13 )

We must remember, when reading passages like  II Corinthians 5:17, the covenant context of the whole of Scripture. When Paul wrote those words to the church, there are several things to keep in mind; first, that he was writing to a particular audience, at a particular time. The particular audience that Paul was writing to was the first-century church at Corinth, and the particular time, as we've seen, was not only the first-century church at Corinth, but concerning those 'upon whom the ends of the ages have come' ( I Corinthians 10:11 ), which 'generation' ( Matthew 23:36, 24:34 ) would see the 'end of all things' ( I Peter 4:7 ).

In this present 'day and age', we as Christians, can easily apply Paul's words to ourselves, and proclaim, as he did, that we are 'a new creation'; it is when we come to the next phrase that we run into problems! 'Old things have passed away'? 'All things have become new'? 'How can you say that?', one wonders, when we still have our ( old ) human nature to deal with, when we have fleshly ( natural, carnal ) desires to ignore? Well, obviously; we can see that, in that sense, 'Old things' have not passed away, 'All things' have not become new. We are faced with several hard ( I would say 'easy' ) choices; either Paul's writings were not inspired ( he was mistaken ), we are not 'in Christ', or Paul was not speaking of biological 'change' ( I Corinthians 15:52 ), not even, in a sense, of the spiritual 'change' that we undergo when the Holy Spirit comes upon us in the 'new birth' ( John 3:1-21 ). So which is it?

I have come to believe that Paul was speaking, not of our conversion, even of theirs, but of the transition, already begun with them, from the Old Covenant age to the New Covenant era, to the age which, like God's Kingdom, 'shall stand forever' ( Daniel 2:44 ( Luke 20:27-36 ). 'Old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new' now makes sense; as the writer to the Hebrews told his brethren, the Old Covenant regime was 'growing old', and was 'ready to vanish away', and the New, already begun at the Advent of Jesus Christ, and inaugurated on the cross, was upon them, 'in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God' ( II Thessalonians 1:8 ), in which 'the heavens will be dissolved, being on fire, and the elements will melt with fervent heat' ( II Peter 3:12 ).

Can we truthfully say today, that we are a ( made ) 'new creation'?

I believe that this phrase may need some adjustment, as applying to us who were never 'under' the law ( Old Covenant ), but that the principle still applies. In Christ we have been 'changed', our conscience has been cleansed, we have been forgiven; we, like those first-century followers of Christ have been 'perfected forever' and are 'being sanctified' ( Hebrews 10:14 )!


May God bless this short study to your understanding, as we all strive to live up to the work that God has done in us, in making us 'a new creation'!

By God's grace,

Charles Shank

Saturday, May 15, 2010

I believe

I believe that there is one God ( Deuteronomy 6:4 ), the great and most holy Spirit ( John 4:24-28 ) ; who manifested Himself in the flesh ( Romans 1:1-3 (  Matthew 1:18-23 ), when He sent His only begotten Son to this earth to be the propitiation ( John 11:49-52 ) for the sins of His people ( Daniel 9:3-19 ), which sacrifice ( Isaiah 53 ( Genesis 3:15 ) had been prophesied throughout the Old Covenant Scriptures.

I believe that all that is visible and invisible ( Colossians 1:16 ( John 1:1-3 )was created by God, through His divine Spirit ( Genesis 1:2 ), and that He reigns over all His creation and over every event ( Isaiah 45:7 ( I Chronicles 29:11 ) that takes place therein.

I believe and trust in this One true God, and His Son, Jesus Christ ( Acts 4:12 ), for my salvation, full and free
( Luke 21:25-28 ( Romans 13:11 ), Romans 5:15-18 )
I believe that the Son of God left His glory in Heaven ( John 17:5 & 24 )and suffered a normal human existence ( Luke 2:21-51 ( Hebrews 2:18 ), as the Son of Man ( Hebrews 4:15 ( Hebrews 2:14 ), in order to offer the one, final, and perfect sacrifice ( Hebrews 7:25-27 ) that had been prophesied throughout the aforementioned ( Exodus 12:5, Numbers 29:36, Ezekiel 46:13 ( I Peter 1:19 ), Hebrews 10:4-14 ) Hebrew Scriptures, and to rise again, thus defeating ( Hebrews 2:14 ( Romans 7:10 ), I Corinthians 15:54-56 ) death ( Genesis 2:15-17 ( II Corinthians 3:7 ) for those who would believe on His name.

I believe that God, in His eternal, everlasting covenant ( Galatians 3:17 ( Genesis 17:19 ) and supernal purpose ( Ephesians 3:8-11 ( Isaiah 55:11 ); purposed ( Philippians 2:11 ( Romans 8:28 ) and predestined ( Ephesians 1:3-6 ( Deuteronomy 14:2 ), James 2:5 ), His people to believe ( Philippians 1:29 ( Ezekiel 36:27 )and accept ( Romans 10:6-16 )these promises.

I believe that God has granted ( Matthew 13:10-16 ( Philippians 1:29 ) us to be made righteous ( II Corinthians 5:21 ) through the suffering, death ( Matthew 27:46-50 ( Hebrews 10:12-14 ), and resurrection I Corinthians 15:12-17 ( Romans 6:8-14, 8:10-12 ) of His Son, Jesus Christ, and that if we are found 'in' ( John 11:26 ) Him; nothing else is necessary, indeed, that nothing is possible to further recommend us before the Father.

I believe that, since the coming in the clouds ( Matthew 26:64 ( Acts 1:9-11 ) of judgment upon apostate Israel, or 'The Great Harlot' ( Ezekiel 16:15-30 ( Hosea 2 ); God Himself now dwells in ( John 14:16-18 ), and among us ( John 14:23 ( Revelation 7:15 ), as promised ( Exodus 29:45 & 46 ), and pictured ( I Kings 8:10-12 ( I Samuel 4:4 ) in the writings of the Hebrew Scriptures.

I believe that the baptism ( Matthew 3:11 ( Mark 1:8 ) of the Holy Spirit of God is the only baptism  ( Ephesians 4:5 ) sufficient ( I Peter 3:21 ( Hebrews 9:13 & 14 ), indeed necessary ( Ephesians 1:7 ( Colossians 1:19-23 ) , to cleanse us, and transfer ( Colossians 1:13 ) us into the Kingdom of God.

I believe that we now commune ( I Corinthians 10:16-18 ) in a spiritual way ( John 4:22 & 23 ) with our Lord, and with each other, not only when we are gathered for worship, but whenever and wherever 'two or three are gathered in His name' ( Matthew 18:20 ( Luke 17:21 ).

in His Kingdom,
& for His glory,
Charles Shank

Thursday, May 06, 2010

Drying the Tears

Our tears are wiped away in Christ! There can be no doubt of this glorious fact; it is when we come to the next phrase  that we run into what some call the 'already, not yet' scenario. 'Yes', you may hear, 'spiritually speaking; God has wiped away all our tears and destroyed death, and we no longer must fear death, but physically speaking, we still suffer pain, we still have sorrow, we still physically expire'. The problem with this kind of reasoning is that it is based on the assumption that God sent His Son to save His people from physical death, and indeed, from the several examples that we have in Scripture of Jesus, even of several prophets in the Old Testament, bringing people back to physical life ( I Kings 17:17-24, I Kings 13:21 ), it is fairly easy to see where people might get that idea, but, as I've written before, and as I believe Scripture teaches; these physical 'risings' ( from the dead ), especially 'under' the Old Covenant, were simply given as pictures of our spiritual resurrection that was to come in the New Covenant, in Christ, who IS the Resurrection!

As believers in 'Fulfilled Eschatology', or 'Covenant Eschatology', one of the greatest pleas against our paradigm, our belief that Christ returned ( in judgment ) how and when He promised, that we now live 'in' 'the new heavens and new earth', and that God ( in His fullness ) once again dwells with ( in the midst of-Luke 17:20 & 21 ) us; is that we ( even as Christians ) still have sorrow and crying, though most will admit that the 'old things' have passed away, those being the 'old man' to whom we died. Many people try to attach too much of a physical meaning to passages like this ( Isaiah 25:8 ), and as with 'the death of Adam' that Christ will deliver us one day from physical sorrow. Besides the fact that not all tears come from sorrow ( I need not tell my readers about 'tears of joy' ); I believe that the Scriptures reveal a covenant story, a story of the people with whom God specially dealt, for the instruction ( II Timothy 3:16 ) of those with whom He is dealing. When Isaiah wrote these words, saying 'He will swallow up death forever, and the Lord God will wipe away tears from all faces; the rebuke of His people He will take away from all the earth; for the Lord has spoken', the first part of which John quoted in the Revelation, he was writing of the glories of the New Covenant, and in particular, the people of God, and His dwelling with them, once again. Within verse 8 here, Isaiah used what I and others, have referred to as a biblical parallelism, saying the thing twice ( or more, in several different ways, and in fact Isaiah, in this example, says basically the same thing, I believe,  covenantally speaking, three times.

'He will swallow up death forever'.

I'm sure that most of my readers are familiar with Daniel's 'seventy weeks' prophecy: in the first part of which, God proclaims that 'Seventy weeks ( literally 'sevens' ) are determined for your people and for your holy city, to finish the transgression, to make an end of ( literally 'seal up' ) sins, to make reconciliation for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy, and to anoint the Most Holy.' ( Daniel 9:24 ) Admittedly; no mention of 'death' here, not in so many words anyway, but later on in his prophecy, he writes, speaking of the same scenario, that 'many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, some to shame and everlasting contempt' ( Daniel 12:2 ) ( notice that he did not contrast 'life' with 'death' ), which saying Jesus quoted, in other words, in Matthew 25:46.

So what did Isaiah mean when he wrote that God would 'swallow up death forever'? If he meant that God would 'make an end of' death, as in the Revelation ( 21:14 ) 'Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire' ( we must be careful here too, not to over-physicalize ), then, as some would say, death has not been 'cast into the lake of fire', because we still expire physically.

This brings up yet another question, based on a wrong assumption, that the death that Christ came to save His people from, was physical death. To my knowledge, the Scriptures never say, especially in so many words, that Jesus came to save us from death, and especially not physical death. Jesus implied very strongly that He would save those that believed in Him from spiritual death, but I believe that an in-depth study ( which this is not ) will reveal that physical death was never the issue; Jesus obviously wasn't speaking of physical death in John 11:26 when He told Martha that 'he who lives and believes in Me will never die'! As I've quoted before, however; it was said of the Christ that 'He will save His people from their sins' ( Matthew 1:21 )

'The Lord God will wipe away tears from all faces'.


'Looking through the OT prophets, we see that David was wont to use this terminology to describe, among other things, a deep spiritual longing for restoration to communion with God (Psalm 42:3 ); in Psalm 80, he reminds his people ( and God ) of the curse of disassociation with Him, that He placed upon Adam and through him, his progeny ( Genesis 3:19 ): in Psalm 116:8, he realizes ( prophetically ) that God has delivered 'my soul from death, my eyes from tears................': Jeremiah, in the context of the New Covenant/New Heavens and Earth, records God as saying 'refrain your voice from weeping, your eyes from tears.............' ( Jeremiah 31:16 ). Malachi says that the 'tears' of 'God's people' ( Israel ) were not a good thing, but were, in essence what finally separated them from God ( Malachi 2:13 ), in fact, along these lines; the writer of Hebrews reminded them that Esau, though he 'sought it ( repentance ) diligently with tears', he found no place for repentance.' From 'Is This It?, or 'No more tears' (  October 2007 )

I wanted to add here, Jesus words ( almost a direct quotation of Isaiah 25:8 ) in Revelation 21:4, 'And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away.'  The last phrase here, should immediately bring to mind Paul's very similar statement in II Corinthians 5:17; 'Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold all things have become new.' ( Do you think John had these words in mind when he wrote Revelation 21:4? )

'The rebuke of His people He will take away from all the earth'.


Daniel wrote, at the inspiration of the Holy Spirit of God, in the passage that we read above ( 12:2 ) that some ( the wicked ) would awake to 'shame and everlasting contempt' ( In relation to the conflagration of AD70, which is Jesus' primary concern here, remember that Jesus was present at this time, having come in the clouds of judgment, and thus those unrepentant Jews, who had continuously and then finally rejected Christ, were very literally tormented in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb!  from 'ECP and the Resurrection of Condemnation' ( March 2010 )  Because of their sin and blasphemy against God, the children of His people were reminded that 'Your sons have fainted: They lie at the head of all the streets; like an antelope in a net; they are full of the fury of the LORD; the rebuke of your God.' ( Isaiah 51:20 ( Jeremiah 2:19 )  God spoke these words through the prophet Ezekiel, 'Therefore say to the house of Israel, Thus says the Lord GOD; I do not do this for your sake, O house of Israel, but for My holy name's sake, which you have profaned among the nations wherever you went' ( 36:22 ) Remember, during the Exodus, when the children of Israel had made the 'golden calf'? When God told Moses to 'let Me alone, that My wrath may burn hot against them and I may consume them' ( Exodus 32:10 ), Moses pled for the 'children' of Israel, saying 'Why should the Egyptians speak, and say, ‘He brought them out to harm them, to kill them in the mountains, and to consume them from the face of the earth’' ( 32:12 ) The Hebrew transliteration cherpah, used here, and translated 'rebuke', could also be translated ( and often is ) 'reproach'. The example above, from Exodus 32, is just one example that we can find in the Hebrew Scriptures of how these 'children' brought reproach, not only on their name, but on their Father's name as well, and even more importantly! In the New Covenant, as promised in places like Jeremiah 31:34 ( 'I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more' ), and Ezekiel 36:29 ( 'I will deliver you from all your uncleannesses' ), God has removed the reproach, the shame, of His people.

Some might say that the reproach, and the tears, of His people ( much less, death ) have not been removed, which in a very physical sense, is true enough, but we must remember the covenant context of Isaiah ( God's, really ) words. The death that he wrote about, that Jesus came to save His people from, was the sin-death of Adam, and as we can see from passages like Hosea 13:14 and Hebrews 2:14, that what He promised, He also performed on the Day of Jesus Christ.

Finally; of the title of this article, 'Drying the Tears'; one might wonder why I've chosen to title this article in such a way as to convey the notion of an ongoing process: above, I wrote that in a very physical sense, our reproach has not been removed ( the name of 'Christian' has become almost a shameful thing, once again, in some circles ), and tears have not all been wiped away; but as the people of God, as the 'healing leaves' that we are called to be, we do wipe away each others tears, we bear each others burdens, 'the reproaches of those that reproach You have fallen on Me' ( Psalm 69:9 ). As we continually wipe away ( dry ) each others tears by the healing power that God has placed within each one of His people, as we fulfill our mandate as 'the leaves of the Tree', even the spiritual promises of God will have a greater impact on the physical creation around us!

In the Strength of Christ alone,
fulfilling His dominion mandate,
Charles Shank

Monday, April 19, 2010

Conversations with a 'bullfrog' ( 'If I was the king of the world..........tell you what I'd do..............' )

'Am I a narcissist?'

No 'hello; how are you': nothing, just another blurtation, something I was getting quite used to when conversing with my 'friend', Jeremiah Bereano!

Although I was sorely tempted to reply with the rudeness that he began the conversation with ( 'He started it!' ) by affirming what somebody else had obviously had the 'guts' to tell him to his face, and tell him that, 'YES'; he was indeed a narcissist of the highest order, I held my natural feelings in check, and asked him instead why he would ask that. ( I wasn't even for sure what the word meant, exactly! )

Woops!

'Do you even know what a narcissist is?', he asked. Not even waiting ( politely ) for a reply; my friend went on, answering his own question, 'the definition that I found on-line, at dictionary.com, is 'inordinate fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity', and number two is even worse, 'Psychoanalysis. erotic gratification derived from admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition at the infantile level of personality development.'

( Wow; I was glad that I hadn't succumbed and told him that he was a narcissist: he was a little ego-centric, thought a bit much of himself, but he wasn't THAT bad! )


Not yet acknowledging that he had asked me a question that I hadn't really answered yet; I asked him again, 'why would you ask me that?


I could tell, as immature as he could be at times, that he was ready to fire back with the much-used 'I asked you first!', but instead, he, almost petulantly replied that he had been getting the feeling lately that people thought that he took himself too seriously, that he took too much on himself, as if he had something that they, or others, didn't have.


Further 'skirting' his blatant question; I asked him; Do you think too much of yourself? Do you take too much on yourself? Do you think that you have something that others don't?'


My friend must have really been hurting, because instead of coming back with something like, 'Are you mocking me?' ( which I kinda was ), he replied that he wondered about that himself, sometimes. 'Am I really sharing my gift, ministering, even preaching as I am, or am I just using my 'gift' as a 'crutch', as an excuse not to be concerned with DOING something else I should be ( though, sometimes I wonder if I'm equipped for that )?'


'Do you believe that you should be doing something other than what you are doing?', I asked.


'Well', he replied, 'maybe not something 'other' than what I have been doing, but something else as well as what I've been doing!'


I aked him then ( I should have asked this first, probably ), 'Do you believe that God has called you to do what you've been doing?'


'Yes', he quickly replied!


'Do you believe that He called you to do this other thing that you're so obviously worried about?'


'Of course', he ( almost as quickly and vehemently ) replied!


Where's the problem then', I asked,' if God gave you both tasks; don't you believe that He would give you the ability to 'carry it off'? 'If you're wondering if he's given you the ability to DO what He's given you to do, then maybe it's not He that's given it to you to do, but you yourself who only ( because of a guilty conscience, or whatever ) think that it's your job, that you only think it's what you ought, or need to do!' 'Doesn't He tell us, in other words, in the Scriptures, that HHe won't give us more than we can handle, and that He always gives us the ability along with a 'charge'?'


'Well, yes', he replied, 'but...........'


'No 'buts' about it', I said ( I was on a roll now ), 'God has given you a gift, my friend, and if you feel that He has called you to it, along with the other; then you better be occupied, to the best of your ability, with doing both!' 'If you don't feel like God has given you, or that He's taken away from you, the ability to do one or the other, then maybe you'd better examine yourself and realize that maybe the problem IS you, not that you're a narcissist, but that you've begun to trust you're own feelings more than God and, for whatever reason, have given up on both accounts!'

As soon as I said it; I was almost sorry that I had, because I could tell from the silence on the other end that I had struck a 'nerve'. ( in fact, I could almost smell the tears )

After a few moments of stunned silence; Jeremiah ( almost crying now ) feebly ( and humbly ) re-phrased ( and re-formed ) his question, making it more of a statement, 'So you DO think I'm a narcissist!'

'No', I said, 'but maybe just a little too reliant on your feelings sometimes, a bit egotistical as well, and too concerned ( even to the point of worrying ) about what others think, or might think about you, and what they might think about what you believe that God has given you to do.' 'Be a man', I said, 'don't apologize for what you believe God has given you!' 'If you believe so strongly that God has given you a job to do ( whatever that job may be ), then you'd better be DOING it, no matter how hard it is, or wwhat feelings you're getting from people!'

I could tell that my friend needed some 'quiet time' right now, so after a little of our usual ( not quite the usual ) 'banter'; I gave him some lame excuse about someone at the door, or having to make another call, or something like that..................

'Goodbye, Jer; trust God to help you get things sorted out; ask for His wisdom and remember; I stilll love you, and I'll be praying for you, brother!'

'I love you too, man', he quietly replied, 'bye, Chuck!'

I hung up the phone, breathing a silent prayer ( and a sigh of relief )............

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Mary, Mary ( quite contrary? )

I originally wrote this little study yesterday for a pastor friend of mine, using the KJV.

Now when Jesus was in Bethany, in the house of Simon the leper, There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat. But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste? For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor. When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me. For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always.  For in that she hath poured this ointment on my body, she did it for my burial.  Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached in the whole world, there shall also this, that this woman hath done, be told for a memorial of her. Matthew 26:6-13

And being in Bethany in the house of Simon the leper, as he sat at meat, there came a woman having an alabaster box of ointment of spikenard very precious; and she brake the box, and poured it on his head. And there were some that had indignation within themselves, and said, Why was this waste of the ointment made? For it might have been sold for more than three hundred pence, and have been given to the poor. And they murmured against her. And Jesus said, Let her alone; why trouble ye her? she hath wrought a good work on me. For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always. She hath done what she could: she is come aforehand to anoint my body to the burying. Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done shall be spoken of for a memorial of her. Mark 14:3-9

And one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee's house, and sat down to meat. And, behold, a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee's house, brought an alabaster box of ointment, And stood at his feet behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did wipe them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet, and anointed them with the ointment. Now when the Pharisee which had bidden him saw it, he spake within himself, saying, This man, if he were a prophet, would have known who and what manner of woman this is that toucheth him: for she is a sinner. And Jesus answering said unto him, Simon, I have somewhat to say unto thee. And he saith, Master, say on. There was a certain creditor which had two debtors: the one owed five hundred pence, and the other fifty. And when they had nothing to pay, he frankly forgave them both. Tell me therefore, which of them will love him most? Simon answered and said, I suppose that he, to whom he forgave most. And he said unto him, Thou hast rightly judged. And he turned to the woman, and said unto Simon, Seest thou this woman? I entered into thine house, thou gavest me no water for my feet: but she hath washed my feet with tears, and wiped them with the hairs of her head. Thou gavest me no kiss: but this woman since the time I came in hath not ceased to kiss my feet. My head with oil thou didst not anoint: but this woman hath anointed my feet with ointment. Wherefore I say unto thee, Her sins, which are many, are forgiven; for she loved much: but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little. And he said unto her, Thy sins are forgiven. And they that sat at meat with him began to say within themselves, Who is this that forgiveth sins also? And he said to the woman, Thy faith hath saved thee; go in peace. Luke 7:36-50

Then Jesus six days before the passover, came to Bethany, where Lazarus was which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead. There they made him a supper; and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him. Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment. Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, which should betray him, Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor? This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein. Then said Jesus, Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this. For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always. John 12:1-8

Matthew, Mark, and John all record the story of this woman anointing Jesus at a house in Bethany, but while Matthew and Mark made very clear whose house it was ( 'the house of Simon the leper' ); John is not so clear, merely saying that He 'came to Bethany, where Lazarus was', which needn't imply that it was Lazarus' house, simply that this house was in Bethany, where Lazarus lived. Other than some easily noted similarities between these accounts and Luke's account; there does not seem to be much reason to think that the Gospel writers all wrote of the same woman.

Let's note a few of the similarities first; Matthew, Mark, and Luke all have the woman bringing an alabaster box of ointment. Matthew and Mark both said that it was 'very precious', but Luke simply recorded that she 'brought an alabaster box of ointment'. John tells us that this woman was Lazarus' sister Mary, and that she took a 'pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly'. Matthew and Mark record that this woman 'poured it on his head', but Luke wrote that she 'kissed his feet, and anointed them with the ointment' and John that Mary took the oil and 'anointed the feet of Jesus'. Luke was the only Gospel writer that said that the woman 'stood at his feet behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did wipe them with the hairs of her head', but John also reported that Mary 'wiped his feet with her hair'. As we noted before; Matthew and Mark both report that it was 'the house of Simon the leper', and while Luke implied ( strongly ) that it was Simon's house, he recorded that Simon was a Pharisee, rather than leper ( could a leper be a Pharisee? ( Leviticus 22:4, Numbers 5:2 ), and interestingly enough, John makes the notating that Judas Iscariot was the son of Simon. Are we to believe that this is just a coincidence? Matthew and Mark recorded the indignation of some of the disciples at this frivolous use ( as they observed ) of this expensive ointment, saying in Mark's account that it could have been sold for 'more than three hundred pence', with which John's basically agrees, except that he reports that Judas asked 'Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?' Luke's Gospel is silent as to anyone complaining about the waste, but when Jesus began His parable of the two debtors; He told Simon ( the leprous Pharisee? ) 'There was a certain creditor which had two debtors: the one owed five hundred pence, and the other fifty'.

Interestingly enough; the context of Luke's account is the Pharisee's and lawyers rejection of the truth that Jesus brought ( v. 30 ), for which reason Jesus told them ( Simon in particular ), 'to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little' ( the Pharisees thought they were righteous, and owed little to God, and therefore rejected the Righteousness that Jesus brought ( 'I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.'- Matthew 9:13, Mark 2:17 ( Luke 5:32 ). I believe that too many similarities exist here for these accounts to be speaking of two different occurrences. In Matthew, Mark, and John; Jesus answers the disciple's complaint by telling them that she had done it to prepare His body for burial, that they had the poor with them always, to leave her alone, and in Matthew and Mark only, that this story would be told of her for a memorial. In Luke's Gospel, He simply forgave her sins when He saw her tears of repentance!

While the first three accounts do not give the woman a name, we can very easily guess that this woman was Mary of Bethany, the woman that John names in his account. Was the woman in Luke's story the same as in the other Gospels? Personally; I believe so, but from other stories that have Mary in them, it would seem not, but then Paul was a persecutor of the Church, a great sinner himself! Was Mary of Bethany this 'sinner' that Simon was all aghast about? Stranger things happened during the earthly ministry of Jesus!

In the love of Christ ( God ),
Charles Shank

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Why do 'bad' things happen to good people?

This is a question that has been asked, literally, I'm sure, a million times, and will be asked at least a million more; in fact, it's probably a question that you've asked yourself numerous times. A better way to phrase the question, though, might be, 'DO bad things happen to good people?' I'm sure that all, or most, of my readers are familiar with Paul's famous words in Romans 8:28, 'And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose'. Sure; we all can say, from our own personal experience, that something bad has happened in our life, even ( maybe especially ) after we came to Christ! But was it really bad? Or was it just something that we didn't/don't like? I believe that we, especially as Christians, can look back ( 'hindsight is 20/20' ) at all the 'bad' things that have happened in our short lives ( which are 'but a vapor'-Psalm 39:5 ) and realize, acknowledge that, through it all, God was working in our behalf, either causing everything to work together for our good, or, as the Century English Version reads, 'We know that God is always at work for the good of everyone who loves him'. Either way; it should be obvious that God works in our lives what He has purposed for our good, but most of all, for His glory!

What do we mean by 'bad' things?

To clarify what we mean by 'bad' things; it might help to be reminded of a few examples from Scripture. Probably one of the more familiar examples ( it jumps immediately to my mind! ) is what happened to Joseph, beginning in  Genesis 37:27 & 28, 'Come and let us sell him to the Ishmaelites, and let not our hand be upon him, for he is our brother and our flesh.” And his brothers listened. Then Midianite traders passed by; so the brothers pulled Joseph up and lifted him out of the pit, and sold him to the Ishmaelites for twenty shekels of silver. And they took Joseph to Egypt.', and ending with Genesis 45:5-8, 'But now, do not therefore be grieved or angry with yourselves because you sold me here; for God sent me before you to preserve life. For these two years the famine has been in the land, and there are still five years in which there will be neither plowing nor harvesting. And God sent me before you to preserve a posterity for you in the earth, and to save your lives by a great deliverance. So now it was not you who sent me here, but God; and He has made me a father to Pharaoh, and lord of all his house, and a ruler throughout all the land of Egypt.' I'm sure that Joseph had thoughts similar to many of us, when his brothers stripped him of his 'favored' ( Genesis 37:3 ) status symbol and threw him into the pit to wait for death, sooner or later, but through his faith in God, and his experiences in Egypt; Joseph was abe to look back on all his 'bad' experiences and see that God had indeed been working for his good, all along. ( You might also read of his 'bad' experience with a woman, in Genesis 39, for more on how God used something 'bad' for Joseph's good )

Another Scriptural example of God using a 'bad' situation for good, is found in Judges 14, in the story of Sampson. As Christians today; we might easily condemn certain things done by this judge of Israel as 'bad' things, and no doubt they were wrong, and sinful, according to God's direct command ( Exodus 34:12-16 ( Ezra 9:12 ), for example, we read in Judges 14:1& 2, that 'Samson went down to Timnah, and saw a woman in Timnah of the daughters of the Philistines. So he went up and told his father and mother, saying, I have seen a woman in Timnah of the daughters of the Philistines; now therefore, get her for me as a wife', and then, a little later ( verse 4 ), God's good purpose is revealed; 'But his father and mother did not know that it was of the LORD—that He was seeking an occasion to move against the Philistines. For at that time the Philistines had dominion over Israel.' Reading further, In Judges 16:28-30, we can see that even though Sampson had a bad, or wrong motive ( 'that I may with one blow, take vengeance on the Philistines for my two eyes' ) that God's good purpose for Israel was accomplished through Sampson's questionable efforts.

There are many other examples throughout Scripture, of God using 'bad' people, actions, or situations for the good of His people, including II Samuel 18 & 19, when King Saul began to turn against David, which I'm sure David saw as a 'bad' thing, but later in life was shown, in David's eventual triumph in becoming king of all Israel, to have been a good thing, by causing him to grow ( in the Lord ), and forcing him to rely on God's providence for his sustenance, and believing ( trusting ) His promises ( I Samuel 16:13 )! We could look, in the New Testament, at the example of Paul & Silas being beaten and placed in stocks & bonds ( prison ), but later revealing God's good purpose for this 'bad' situation through their meeting the Philippians jailer and bringing Salvation to his household, in Acts 16:16-34.

Thinking of 'bad' things that happen, not just to people individually ( although everybody has a story ), but to whole cultures, civilizations, and areas; take, for instance what recently happened to New Orleans, before that the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Even more recently we remember a tsunami in Indonesia, not to mention earthquakes in Chile and Haiti and others closer to home, and more recent! Why do all these 'bad' things happen? When you look back on it, and many have, I'm sure; we can see that floods always have a 'cleansing' effect ( sure, it might take awhile to see that ), fires having much the same effect, and in the aftermath of 9-11, and other such 'bad' things ( which they were; horrible, don't get me wrong ), we have all witnessed, whether in person or through the media, of people pulling together, out of whatever motives, to help their fellow man, just because he needed it. This is, and will be, I'm convinced, an ongoing thing until we all realize why God has put us here on this good earth, and why 'bad things happen to 'good' people!

What is meant by 'good' people?

I like to believe, on a very physical level, in the inherent 'goodness' ( honesty, kindness, etc. ) of most people, and can personally attest to the fact that most people, when it comes down to it, will 'give you the shirt off their backs' if you have a real, evident need, but probably as many can give examples of people that are just 'bad to the bone', with not an honest or kind bone in their body. When people ask the question 'why do bad things happen to good people'; more often than not, I believe that they have in mind the above description of 'good' people ( they also might be thinking of the 'innocence' of those killed ( think 9-11 ), but even Christians ask this question, even almost, as Jesus on the cross, crying 'My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?' ( Matthew 27:46 )

A wise man once wrote 'All things come alike to all: one event happens to the righteous and the wicked; to the good,[a] the clean, and the unclean; to him who sacrifices and him who does not sacrifice. As is the good, so is the sinner; he who takes an oath as he who fears an oath'. ( Ecclesiastes 9:2 ), and as Jesus said of His Father, 'He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust' ( Matthew 5:45 ).When things like I described above happen, whether it be personally experienced ( death in the family, loss of a home, etc. ) or on a larger level; we, as humans, tend to think 'what did I do wrong?', or, even more to the point, 'what did THEY do wrong!', when, as Jesus and Solomon said, they just happpened! (Not that anything 'just' happens, because I believe that nothing happens for no reason! ) Everything that happens ( I believe ), happens for our good, as Paul said above, and for His purpose and Glory! ( not either, that this makes God the Author of 'evil', because God, by His very nature, His very essence, can do, can be, nothing but good; He is goodness itself! )( this brings me to my next ( bonus ) question )


Can there be good without God?

Humanly speaking; I believe that we can, in a sense, say that without condemning ourselves too thoroughly. By the above definition, people can do, even be good ( some of the time-like I tell people, 'We can be good, but God is good!' ), so in that sense, 'bad things do happen to good people'! You might say though, that 'bad' things like a death in the family, loss of a house, car, livlihood, etc. happen to Christians too: 'why?' I believe that the answers, several of which we've seen here, can be found in the Scriptures, and usually, by waiting patiently, in hindsight.

In the spiritual sense, of course ( and even in the physical sense of God granting even the wicked their breath ) there is no one good, or righteous, except those for whom Christ died, thus tranferring His righteousness upon us, making us 'the righteousness of God' ( II Corinthians 5:21 ( Isaiah 61:10 )!

I hope that these words will bring comfort to their readers, because, as I said above 'I'm sure that we can all personally attest to 'bad' things in our own lives', and that we can all realize that, on a physical level, anyway, things just happen, good or bad ( whether we like them or not ) and that sometimes it's how we look at the things that God sends us that make them 'good' or 'bad': with God, 'It's all good!'

In Christ's love ( the love of God ),
            Charles Shank